Problem 481

A place to air possible concerns or difficulties in understanding ProjectEuler problems. This forum is not meant to publish solutions. This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods or giving hints how a problem can be solved.
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.

This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.

In particular don't post any code fragments or results.

Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems

Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem

Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one


See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
Post Reply
Anton_Lunyov
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:10 am

Problem 481

Post by Anton_Lunyov »

It is not accessible and side says:
Problem 481 will be accessible in 23 hours, 52 minutes (Sat, 20 Sep 2014, 20:00)
Current date/time on server: Sat, 20 Sep 2014, 20:08
The same was for 480 but it gets accessible in 3-4 minutes.
User avatar
euler
Administrator
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: Cheshire, England
Contact:

Re: Problem 481

Post by euler »

Thank you for reporting it. I think that I located the bug and it should now be fixed.
Image
impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae
Garrit
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:22 am

problem 481

Post by Garrit »

Two questions:
1.
It seems there is a infinite recursion, it is possible that each chef get an unfavorable rating ever single turn forever, and this will obviously tend to zero as the turns tend to infinity, but, the computer doesn't necessarily know that. What am I missing about this question? if they get an unfavorable rating are they eliminated automatically?

2.
What happens with the chef probabilities on each round where an elimination occurs?
Say chef one gets a favorable rating, and eliminates chef 14.
does chef 2 have S(2)=[frac]F2,F15[/frac] or S(2)=[frac]F2,F14[/frac] ?

<Moved by moderator: Please don't create a new topic for a problem if there is already an existing one. Please use the search function if you are unsure if a topic has been created yet or not.>
User avatar
Marcus_Andrews
Administrator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: problem 481

Post by Marcus_Andrews »

Garrit:

1. As you say, it is possible for that to happen. Can you take this into account somehow?

2. In this competition, you are not directly eliminated for having an unfavorably-rated dish. You are eliminated if another chef gets a favorable rating who then chooses to eliminate you.

3. A chef's skill level is assigned at the start of the tournament, and it does not change at any time.
noms
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:59 am

Re: Problem 481

Post by noms »

(results removed by moderator)
noms
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:59 am

Re: Problem 481

Post by noms »

Nobody ? :(
User avatar
Marcus_Andrews
Administrator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: Problem 481

Post by Marcus_Andrews »

As per the big red box near the top of this page, please do not discuss partial results/spoilers or ask for hints.

viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1356#p12839
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1989#p21039

That being said: In general, if you can't get the math to work out for a particular case, it usually helps to tackle a simpler case first. There are actually clarification posts in this very thread that should help as well.
noms
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:59 am

Re: Problem 481

Post by noms »

Thank you Markus for your answer and sorry :oops: for my "spoil". With more than hundred answer to this problem, I was thinking that my three lines of "code" was not a problem (sorry for my poor English). I don't need Math for this problem but only need to know if I am right in thinking that, with three chefs, #1, #2, #3, the next player after chef #3 is chef#1... Or my compréhension of English is too bad.
User avatar
Marcus_Andrews
Administrator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: Problem 481

Post by Marcus_Andrews »

Yes, it'd be chef #1's turn again (assuming he/she is not eliminated by chef #3).
noms
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:59 am

Re: Problem 481

Post by noms »

And then, in the case S(1) = 0.25, S(2) = 0.5 and S(3) = 1, am I right or not when I find W3(1) = 0.2 and not W3(1) = 0.29375 ?
User avatar
Marcus_Andrews
Administrator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: Problem 481

Post by Marcus_Andrews »

W3(1) = 0.29375 is the correct result.
damiengif
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:29 am

Re: Problem 481

Post by damiengif »

This problems reminds me of the 'El Jj truel' problem
http://eljjdx.canalblog.com/archives/20 ... 18907.html

Likewise, on his first turn, chef #1 should rather make sure that his dish won't be assessed favorably.
His probability of winning will become greater : W3(1) = 0.325

This violates problem 481 rule : "On each chef's turn, he/she cooks up a dish to the best of his/her ability".
But, we could consider "cheating" as a strategy ;-)
Image
Post Reply