Problem 481
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
In particular don't post any code fragments or results.
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
-
Anton_Lunyov
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:10 am
Problem 481
It is not accessible and side says:
Problem 481 will be accessible in 23 hours, 52 minutes (Sat, 20 Sep 2014, 20:00)
Current date/time on server: Sat, 20 Sep 2014, 20:08
The same was for 480 but it gets accessible in 3-4 minutes.
Problem 481 will be accessible in 23 hours, 52 minutes (Sat, 20 Sep 2014, 20:00)
Current date/time on server: Sat, 20 Sep 2014, 20:08
The same was for 480 but it gets accessible in 3-4 minutes.
- euler
- Administrator
- Posts: 5095
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:49 pm
- Location: Cheshire, England
- Contact:
Re: Problem 481
Thank you for reporting it. I think that I located the bug and it should now be fixed.

impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae
-
Garrit
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:22 am
problem 481
Two questions:
1.
It seems there is a infinite recursion, it is possible that each chef get an unfavorable rating ever single turn forever, and this will obviously tend to zero as the turns tend to infinity, but, the computer doesn't necessarily know that. What am I missing about this question? if they get an unfavorable rating are they eliminated automatically?
2.
What happens with the chef probabilities on each round where an elimination occurs?
Say chef one gets a favorable rating, and eliminates chef 14.
does chef 2 have S(2)=[frac]F2,F15[/frac] or S(2)=[frac]F2,F14[/frac] ?
<Moved by moderator: Please don't create a new topic for a problem if there is already an existing one. Please use the search function if you are unsure if a topic has been created yet or not.>
1.
It seems there is a infinite recursion, it is possible that each chef get an unfavorable rating ever single turn forever, and this will obviously tend to zero as the turns tend to infinity, but, the computer doesn't necessarily know that. What am I missing about this question? if they get an unfavorable rating are they eliminated automatically?
2.
What happens with the chef probabilities on each round where an elimination occurs?
Say chef one gets a favorable rating, and eliminates chef 14.
does chef 2 have S(2)=[frac]F2,F15[/frac] or S(2)=[frac]F2,F14[/frac] ?
<Moved by moderator: Please don't create a new topic for a problem if there is already an existing one. Please use the search function if you are unsure if a topic has been created yet or not.>
- Marcus_Andrews
- Administrator
- Posts: 1637
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm
Re: problem 481
Garrit:
1. As you say, it is possible for that to happen. Can you take this into account somehow?
2. In this competition, you are not directly eliminated for having an unfavorably-rated dish. You are eliminated if another chef gets a favorable rating who then chooses to eliminate you.
3. A chef's skill level is assigned at the start of the tournament, and it does not change at any time.
1. As you say, it is possible for that to happen. Can you take this into account somehow?
2. In this competition, you are not directly eliminated for having an unfavorably-rated dish. You are eliminated if another chef gets a favorable rating who then chooses to eliminate you.
3. A chef's skill level is assigned at the start of the tournament, and it does not change at any time.
- Marcus_Andrews
- Administrator
- Posts: 1637
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm
Re: Problem 481
As per the big red box near the top of this page, please do not discuss partial results/spoilers or ask for hints.
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1356#p12839
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1989#p21039
That being said: In general, if you can't get the math to work out for a particular case, it usually helps to tackle a simpler case first. There are actually clarification posts in this very thread that should help as well.
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1356#p12839
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1989#p21039
That being said: In general, if you can't get the math to work out for a particular case, it usually helps to tackle a simpler case first. There are actually clarification posts in this very thread that should help as well.
-
noms
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:59 am
Re: Problem 481
Thank you Markus for your answer and sorry
for my "spoil". With more than hundred answer to this problem, I was thinking that my three lines of "code" was not a problem (sorry for my poor English). I don't need Math for this problem but only need to know if I am right in thinking that, with three chefs, #1, #2, #3, the next player after chef #3 is chef#1... Or my compréhension of English is too bad.
- Marcus_Andrews
- Administrator
- Posts: 1637
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm
-
noms
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:59 am
Re: Problem 481
And then, in the case S(1) = 0.25, S(2) = 0.5 and S(3) = 1, am I right or not when I find W3(1) = 0.2 and not W3(1) = 0.29375 ?
- Marcus_Andrews
- Administrator
- Posts: 1637
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm
-
damiengif
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:29 am
Re: Problem 481
This problems reminds me of the 'El Jj truel' problem
http://eljjdx.canalblog.com/archives/20 ... 18907.html
Likewise, on his first turn, chef #1 should rather make sure that his dish won't be assessed favorably.
His probability of winning will become greater : W3(1) = 0.325
This violates problem 481 rule : "On each chef's turn, he/she cooks up a dish to the best of his/her ability".
But, we could consider "cheating" as a strategy
http://eljjdx.canalblog.com/archives/20 ... 18907.html
Likewise, on his first turn, chef #1 should rather make sure that his dish won't be assessed favorably.
His probability of winning will become greater : W3(1) = 0.325
This violates problem 481 rule : "On each chef's turn, he/she cooks up a dish to the best of his/her ability".
But, we could consider "cheating" as a strategy
