Problem 179
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
In particular don't post any code fragments or results.
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
-
ashishn42
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:37 pm
Re: Problem 179
Yes,in fact I tested it for several values and for each one of them v[n] gave correct value of number of divisors...
-
Georg
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:00 am
- Location: Mannheim, Germany
- Contact:
-
ashishn42
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:37 pm
Re: Problem 179
Really thanks.It was an integer overflow.Though I am still unable to figure out how you found this out.Georg wrote:The error occurs in subroutine f.
14369 is a prime.
-
Junglemath
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2019 1:25 pm
- Location: Minsk
Re: Problem 179
Anyone reading this in 2019 want to check some of my numbers? I spent a ton of time on this and I think my program is computing everything correctly, but I keep getting that ugly red X when I submit my answer.