Hi,
Could someone clarify for me what is meant by "ratio of its proper fractions that are resilient"?
What I understand to be the ratio of the resilient fractions for d=12 is :
(1/12):(5/12):(7/12):(11/12)
and I calculate this to be 144/385. So clearly my understanding is different to yours.
Could you clarify?
Thanks,
Chris
Problem 243
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
In particular don't post any code fragments or results.
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
- ed_r
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:57 am
Re: Problem 243
R(d) is the number of resilient proper fractions, divided by d-1.
"Proportion" would have been a better word than "ratio".
"Proportion" would have been a better word than "ratio".
!647 = &8FDF4C
-
chrisb555
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:27 am
- Oliver1978
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2014 9:13 pm
- Location: Erfurt, Germany
- Georg
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:00 am
- Location: Mannheim, Germany
- Contact:
-
frodenburg
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:25 am
Re: Problem 243
How come R(12) is the lowest resilient denominator below 40% and that there is ANOTHER lowest denominator below 16%?
What is meant with minimal and what should I be looking for? Is my english the issue?
What is meant with minimal and what should I be looking for? Is my english the issue?
- Animus
- Administrator
- Posts: 1987
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:23 pm
Re: Problem 243
You can find a lower resilent fraction for higher denominators, the question is how big the denominator must get in order to get the resilent fraction below the given treshold for the very first time. That's no contradiction.
PS: Your nickname sounds german. If english is an issue and german is fine, you can PM me "auf Deutsch".
PS: Your nickname sounds german. If english is an issue and german is fine, you can PM me "auf Deutsch".
-
frodenburg
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:25 am
Re: Problem 243
So in this case of lowest below 4/10 means that the 4 is fixed and the lowest x of D(x) with numerator 4 is to be found?
I'll try that and see.
I'll try that and see.
-
frodenburg
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:25 am
Re: Problem 243
By the way, I am Dutch, so German does not really help 
Thanks for your explanation though, I give it a try to see if I understood.
Thanks for your explanation though, I give it a try to see if I understood.