Problem 094
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
In particular don't post any code fragments or results.
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
- Oliver1978
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2014 9:13 pm
- Location: Erfurt, Germany
-
Animesh111
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:58 pm
problem 94
I need clarification in the problem statement of 'almost equilaterals' in problem 94. It says that "Find the sum of the perimeters of all almost equilateral triangles with integral side lengths and area and whose perimeters do not exceed one billion (1,000,000,000)." My doubt is whether the sum of perimeters should be less than a billion or value of perimeter of any triangle should be less than 1 billion.
Kindly tell me
Kindly tell me
- Georg
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:00 am
- Location: Mannheim, Germany
- Contact:
- mpiotte
- Administrator
- Posts: 1961
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 5:40 pm
- Location: Montréal, Canada
Re: problem 94
Please, do not create a new topic if one already exist.Animesh111 wrote:I need clarification in the problem statement of 'almost equilaterals' in problem 94. It says that "Find the sum of the perimeters of all almost equilateral triangles with integral side lengths and area and whose perimeters do not exceed one billion (1,000,000,000)." My doubt is whether the sum of perimeters should be less than a billion or value of perimeter of any triangle should be less than 1 billion.
Kindly tell me
You will notice the same exact question was asked and answered before.
Merged threads.

-
Animesh111
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:58 pm
Re: Problem 094
there is a number 235000835, if we form triangles as sides 235000835,235000835,235000836, we get an almost equilateral triangle satisfying the constraints of the problem. But this number is not included in the final perimeter sum as adding this number increases the sum above 1 billion but the perimeter is less than 1 billion. so what is the question asking for??
- Georg
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:00 am
- Location: Mannheim, Germany
- Contact:
-
Animesh111
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:58 pm
-
enigmaticcam
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:07 am
- TinyTavi
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2025 9:52 pm
Problem 094
For problem 94 it states:
Find the sum of the perimeters of all almost equilateral triangles with integral side lengths and area
Is it supposed to be integer? Or is there something major I am missing?
Find the sum of the perimeters of all almost equilateral triangles with integral side lengths and area
Is it supposed to be integer? Or is there something major I am missing?
-
DJohn
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:24 pm
Re: Problem 94
"Integral side lengths" means the side lengths are integers - "integral" is the adjective corresponding the noun "integer". Since the perimeter is the sum of the side lengths, it's going to be an integer too.TinyTavi wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:54 pm Find the sum of the perimeters of all almost equilateral triangles with integral side lengths and area
Is it supposed to be integer? Or is there something major I am missing?
-
skoczian
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 4:43 pm
- hk
- Administrator
- Posts: 12817
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:34 am
- Location: Haren, Netherlands
-
rbagdazian
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2025 3:53 pm
Re: Problem 094
In the article on Heronian triangles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heronian_triangle) the table of almost equilateral Heronian triangles does not include the following: 227, 227, 228. I get the following integral area for this case: 22378. Why isn't this in the table?
-
bloebje
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2024 4:03 pm
Re: Problem 094
The area is close to an integer, but it is slightly smaller than 22378.rbagdazian wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 2:42 pm In the article on Heronian triangles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heronian_triangle) the table of almost equilateral Heronian triangles does not include the following: 227, 227, 228. I get the following integral area for this case: 22378. Why isn't this in the table?
-
rbagdazian
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2025 3:53 pm
Re: Problem 094
Ah, that's good to know. It's probably why my algo is failing to obtain the correct solution. I guess I have to rethink my approach to testing for integral area.
- Vinny360
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2025 11:02 pm
Re: Problem 094
You are missing some triangles.MaJJ wrote: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:05 pm Is 5479171588 as the final answer at least close?
Edit: Nevermind, I just found out where is my error. I worked only with those triangles that differed by 1, not with those that were in fact equilateral...
Edit 2: Wait, there are no equilateral triangles with integral area. Soooo ... What the hell am I missing?![]()
3.141592653589793238462643383... PE is fun.
Hello from

↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
Hello from

↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
