Problem 836 (View Problem)
I'd add a small note at the bottom saying that for this problem, $57$ is considered to be a prime number.
Problem 836
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
In particular don't post any code fragments or results.
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
- hk
- Administrator
- Posts: 12817
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:34 am
- Location: Haren, Netherlands
Re: Problem 836
Does that help with finding the correct answer??? Or in spreading more mist??

War ruins the life and health of untold numbers of innocent children.
- neverforget
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:10 pm
Re: Problem 836
perhaps I made a mistake in my calculations, but if you take Axiom of Choice then the premise ($f$ being well-defined for $p=57$ and odd $m$) seems to require $57$ to be prime. And without Axiom of Choice then $f$ being well-defined is equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis (which AFAIK has not yet been proven)
Also, I had to consider $0$ to be a number, but that's probably much less controversial.
Another note: it's probably obvious that $f$ does not behave well when $p=2$, but may as well mention that $p\neq 2$, in case someone gets confused.
Also, I had to consider $0$ to be a number, but that's probably much less controversial.
Another note: it's probably obvious that $f$ does not behave well when $p=2$, but may as well mention that $p\neq 2$, in case someone gets confused.

- cat_good
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2026 5:10 pm
Re: Problem 836
read the entire problem!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CAT=GOOD (also, link to online game: http://34.9.32.13:4001)