Page 1 of 1
problem 559
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 4:14 am
by cesium62
When I count P(1, 2, 3) I get 14 and not 19 as given in problem
Problem 559 (
View Problem). There are 36 2x3 matrices associated with the problem, right? I wrote down the 36 matrices. For each, under the first column, I write an 'a' if row 1 column 1 is smaller than row 2 column 1. Similarly under the 2nd column I write an 'a' if row 1 column 2 is smaller than row 2 column 2. I ignore the 3rd column. I count the number of matrices that do not have an 'a' underneath. I keep counting 14 and not 19.
I'm not going to figure out the answer in any event, but I wonder if anyone could help me understand what part of the problem I'm not reading correctly.
Re: problem 559
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 6:15 am
by jaap
cesium62 wrote:For each, under the first column, I write an 'a' if row 1 column 1 is smaller than row 2 column 1. Similarly under the 2nd column I write an 'a' if row 1 column 2 is smaller than row 2 column 2. I ignore the 3rd column.
An ascent occurs when a whole column is smaller than the column to its right. So the above should read:
For each, under the first column, I write an 'a' if row 1 column 1 is smaller than row 1 column 2, and row 2 column 1 is smaller than row 2 column 2. Similarly under the 2nd column I write an 'a' if row 1 column 2 is smaller than row 1 column 3, and row 2 column 2 is smaller than row 2 column 3.
Re: problem 559
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 10:17 pm
by Animus
cesium62 wrote:For each, under the first column, I write an 'a' if row 1 column 1 is smaller than row 2 column 1. Similarly under the 2nd column I write an 'a' if row 1 column 2 is smaller than row 2 column 2. I ignore the 3rd column. I count the number of matrices that do not have an 'a' underneath. I keep counting 14 and not 19.
Hi, cesium62,
jaap is rigth, your mixing up rows and columns. A column ascent does
not mean that the elements in any column appear in ascending order, but that for the column examined the element in this column is smaller than the element in the next column for all rows.
Thus, for example, $\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 & 3 \\ 3 & 2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$ shows no column ascent and counts for P(1,2,3) although the elements in column 1 and column 2 are both increasing.
Re: problem 559
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 2:22 am
by cesium62
Thanks.
Re: problem 559
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:33 am
by schang1146
Out of the 36 possible matrices, I still only count 17:
Expand
123
123
123
132
123
213
123
312
132
123
132
132
132
231
213
123
213
213
213
312
231
123
231
132
231
231
312
123
312
213
312
312
What two am I missing or am I not understanding the question right?
Re: problem 559
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:15 am
by mdean
schang1146 wrote:Out of the 36 possible matrices, I still only count 17:
What two am I missing or am I not understanding the question right?
By the look of things, it's quite possible you've listed every matrix not included in P(1,2,3).