Page 1 of 1

Problem 435

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:30 am
by LarryBlake
Shouldn't the problem read...

Define the polynomials ... fixi+1 for 0 ≤ i < n.

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 3:14 am
by mdean
The problem looks to be fine as it is. Remember, the first term is $0x^0$.

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 12:00 pm
by LarryBlake
EDIT: mdean, you are correct, but I could swear it used to say that f0 is defined as 1.

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 12:47 pm
by hk
Actually we keep track of the last update of every problem and by whom.
For this problem it reads:
Release Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013, 16:00
Last Update: Fri, 6 Sep 2013, 04:24 by kevinsogo
So the public version is still the same as when the problem was first published.

So it's better not to swear unless one is absolutely sure.

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:02 pm
by LarryBlake
:D

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:22 pm
by LaughingSkull
This problem totally throws the "one minute rule" out the window, as well as a bunch of other ones as well, such as how your PC only needs to be average at best.

I'm done with PE.

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:39 pm
by mpiotte
LaughingSkull wrote:This problem totally throws the "one minute rule" out the window, as well as a bunch of other ones as well, such as how your PC only needs to be average at best...
I guess it depends on the algorithm you use. My own implementation takes 0.04 second, well under one minute, on any PC, phone or intelligent watch you may own.

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:18 am
by mbh038
Could someone please clarify the meaning of this problem? Specifically, I am not sure what is meant by the final (=15!).

Thanks.

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:39 am
by hk
15!=1307674368000
(15! means factorial(15); see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorial)

Re: Problem 435

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:25 am
by mbh038
Of course, yes. Thanks.