By making use of this way

I find out that

9*1087345 = 9786105

9*26 = 234

concatenated product for 9786105234 is the largest case that I could ever get up with.

In this question, is my understanding of style correct enough

or that am I missing off with something from this question

that is being unknown enough to me, as for now?

By the way, is this juxtaposition style for 9786105 along with 234

as above being a valid enough one, anyway, however man?

## Problem 170

**Forum rules**

As your posts will be visible to the general public you

are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything

that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.

This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.

In particular don't post any code fragments or results.

Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems

Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem

Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one

Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems

Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem

Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one

See also the topics:

Don't post any spoilers

Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.

### Re: Problem 170

Your understanding of everything is correct, but your answer is not the largest.

### Re: Problem 170

Is this atleast valid enough man?

18*547=9846

18*20639=371502

Thus its concatenated product being 9846371502

or are they otherwise being already

solely limited up to single digits only actually?

18*547=9846

18*20639=371502

Thus its concatenated product being 9846371502

or are they otherwise being already

solely limited up to single digits only actually?

Last edited by Raman on Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

### Re: Problem 170

78*12645=986310

78*093=7254

So is 9863107254 a valid answer?

78*093=7254

So is 9863107254 a valid answer?

### Re: Problem 170

Solved the problem, and the answer to leading zeroes appears to be No.