## Search found 335 matches

- Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:48 am
- Forum: Number
- Topic: "Summarizing" sequence
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**4703**

### Re: "Summarizing" sequence

The rounded estimates were thus quite good. 8-) I had to change integers to int64 Was that really necessary? Both the length and sum are well within the int32 range. BTW, how long did your algo take for 70. The estimate for my assembly algo would be about 8 seconds. The main reason I didn't take it ...

- Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:24 pm
- Forum: Number
- Topic: "Summarizing" sequence
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**4703**

### Re: "Summarizing" sequence

The data from the 50th term to the 60th term provided the following ratios: 1- The average of the digits in the final string is relatively constant at 1.6895 plusmn 0.0001 2. The ratio of the sum from one term to the next is relatively constant at 1.304 plusmn 0.0005 3. This also means that the rati...

- Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:52 pm
- Forum: Number
- Topic: "Summarizing" sequence
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**4703**

### Re: "Summarizing" sequence

Here's a descriptive summary of my algo which you can try to implement in your own programing language. [code]//Allocate memory for two "string" buffers buf1 and buf2 (1 Mb for each buffer would be sufficient for the 50th term). One will be the source buffer and the other will be the desti...

- Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:24 am
- Forum: Number
- Topic: "Summarizing" sequence
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**4703**

### Re: "Summarizing" sequence

I agree with ThomasH's sum and string length for the 50th term. The sum of the digits in the 60th term is 21424450 (the string has a length of 12680852), and my algo in assembly took 484 ms on an old P4-1500. The size of the computing part of my app is only 150 bytes. 8-) What programming language a...

- Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:38 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: How is the ranking determined ...
- Replies:
**1** - Views:
**2017**

### Re: How is the ranking determined ...

within the number of problems solved? Yes. And for the same number of problems solved, the ranking is according to the date and time when the latest problem was solved. The previous ranking method (up to about a year ago) was based on a number of point assigned to each problem based on the number o...

- Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:50 pm
- Forum: Combinatorics
- Topic: Minimal snooker
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**3353**

### Re: Minimal snooker

Technically, the minimum winning score would be (15+2+3+4+5+6+7)/2+1 = 23 if neither player pockets a color ball after pocketing each red ball, and no foul is commited throughout the frame. However, the winning player could have pocketed only a single RED ball during the entire frame but accumulated...

- Wed Dec 27, 2006 4:10 am
- Forum: Number Theory
- Topic: smallest multiple of 17 (urgent! )
- Replies:
**6** - Views:
**4930**

Another option you may look into is to determine the length of the recurring cycle of the reciprocal of the number. The reciprocal of 17 would be: 0.058823529411764705882352941176470588235294117647..... and you can see that the recurring cycle would be 0588235294117647 which contains 16 digits. If y...

- Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:26 am
- Forum: Geometry
- Topic: Vector assistance
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**3936**

- Sat May 27, 2006 1:17 am
- Forum: Number Theory
- Topic: Large Perfect Squares
- Replies:
**12** - Views:
**8937**

I came up with that algo based on the fact that regardless of the number of fractional digits you would use for an irrational square root, multiplying it by itself will ALWAYS yield a number a little smaller than the original one. Incrementing any of the fractional digit of the square root will alwa...

- Fri May 26, 2006 4:58 pm
- Forum: Number Theory
- Topic: Large Perfect Squares
- Replies:
**12** - Views:
**8937**

Here's my approach to this problem. Although I have not written a specific program for it, the steps would be as follows. I have tested the procedure with my available square root extractor (which is good for ANY input and an output of up to 9999 fractional digits), and a quick algo to multiply a nu...

- Sun May 14, 2006 4:30 am
- Forum: Number
- Topic: Reverse Difference
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**3591**

- Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:45 am
- Forum: Number
- Topic: Log to base pi
- Replies:
**7** - Views:
**6440**

- Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:17 am
- Forum: Number
- Topic: How Likely To Divide?
- Replies:
**12** - Views:
**11448**

My analysis is: All results are divisible by 1 but its probability of being the divisor is 20%. If both x and y are even, the result will be divisible by both 2 and 4. Probability is 1/2*1/2*2/5 = 10% If both x and y are odd, the result will be divisible by 2. Probability is 1/2*1/2*1/5 = 5% If both...

- Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:24 am
- Forum: Applied Mathematics
- Topic: Diagnosis
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**5701**