## Search found 547 matches

- Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:05 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 273
- Replies:
**37** - Views:
**14769**

### Re: Problem 273

There's an 's' missing in 'integer' in the first line of the problem statement. And the same missing 's' in the same word on line 4. You could add an s, but it is also correct as is, since integer is being used here as an adjective rather than a noun (like "whole" instead of "whole n...

- Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:57 am
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Idea for new Archives display filter
- Replies:
**8** - Views:
**919**

### Re: Idea for new Archives display filter

You can currently filter the archives by All/Solved/Unsolved/Pinned. Any chance of adding a filter for problems which have a new forum post within the past day? You can already see those in the past day by the coloring, but it would be nice to collect them all tightly, rather than looking through 1...

- Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:33 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Errors/Warnings/Bugs
- Replies:
**598** - Views:
**198458**

### Re: Errors/Warnings/Bugs

Two minor irritations: 1. When you select and copy/paste the text of a PE problem, the MathJax is not selected and copied. I like to put the problem into a code comment at the top of my program for the problem, and that is more work now. It used to mostly copy the maths text, except for some weirdne...

- Fri Jul 24, 2020 8:37 am
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Errors/Warnings/Bugs
- Replies:
**598** - Views:
**198458**

### Re: Errors/Warnings/Bugs

Hi, I am having trouble opening the thread for Problem 497. Chrome would load a few posts but when I scrolled down further, it became just a blank screen. Maths formulas were not rendered and code sections would not open. Thank you for reporting this. I cannot load the thread either: the Chrome tab...

- Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:51 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 059
- Replies:
**114** - Views:
**45357**

### Re: Problem 059

Hi! I also have trouble in getting "an OK - problem solved" although I'm like TristenR am pretty sure I've solved it. However, counting up the entries in the original file - I only get 1454... which is contrary to TristenRs 1455. What is the correct number here (in the original text file)...

- Tue Feb 25, 2020 6:32 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 207
- Replies:
**8** - Views:
**5528**

### Re: Problem 207

...where $4^t$, $2^t$, and $k$ are all positive integers and $t$ is a real number. For any m ≥ 1 let P(m) be the proportion of such partitions that are perfect with k ≤ m . So there are two partitions, $4^1 = 2^1 + 2$ and $4^{1.5849625...} = 2^{1.5849625...} + 6$ with $k\le 6$, only one of which ha...

- Mon Feb 10, 2020 5:52 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 701
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**2316**

### Re: Problem 701

701 "Consider the maximum area of connected cells." Nowhere is "maximum area" defined. It's just the literal meaning. The largest possible area of a connected set of (black) cells. Wouldn't the largest possible area be W x H, i.e. the given square with every square a black squar...

- Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:52 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 701
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**2316**

### Re: Problem 701

It's just the literal meaning. The largest possible area of a connected set of (black) cells.Junglemath wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:36 pmProblem 701(View Problem)

"Consider the maximum area of connected cells."

Nowhere is "maximum area" defined.

- Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:49 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: problem 065
- Replies:
**33** - Views:
**12175**

### Re: problem 065

I'm saying that you would not expect a pattern for e, so it is surprising that there is one.

- Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:44 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: problem 065
- Replies:
**33** - Views:
**12175**

### Re: problem 065

In the problem statement it lists 2k as one of the components of the continued fraction, but nowhere is it stated what k is. Help? It is just there to indicate that the pattern shown in the first numbers continues. It shows what an arbitrary section of the list would look like. Here are some other ...

- Fri Jan 31, 2020 9:31 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: problem 065
- Replies:
**33** - Views:
**12175**

### Re: problem 065

In the problem statement it lists 2k as one of the components of the continued fraction, but nowhere is it stated what k is. Help? It is just there to indicate that the pattern shown in the first numbers continues. It shows what an arbitrary section of the list would look like. Here are some other ...

- Fri Dec 20, 2019 5:23 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 027
- Replies:
**25** - Views:
**10818**

### Re: Problem 027

If you'd care to elaborate on such a simple relationship @ PE.net, I would sure appreciate it, as I imagine Lucas-C would too... Take a look at hk's post on the first page of the problem's discussion forum. It shows the relationship between two solutions. If you plot all the related solutions (i.e....

- Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:31 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 027
- Replies:
**25** - Views:
**10818**

### Re: Problem 027

All the solutions on a parabola are related to each other in a very simple way. Given that the solution to the problem lies on such a parabola, it would be a spoiler to discuss it too much.

- Tue Dec 03, 2019 6:51 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 601
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**1586**

### Re: Problem 601

I disagree. $k$ is essentially the length of the streak, i.e. how many consecutive lines in the two examples have divisibility before the line where it is no longer divisible. Like a lucky streak, it is about how long you can keep it going before your luck runs out. The divisibility by 1 is part of ...

- Wed Nov 20, 2019 4:19 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 689
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**1943**

### Re: Problem 689

Thanks for the clarification. I'm still worried that f(x) may not be clearly defined. For example, the decimal fraction 1/2 has two binary representations: 0.1000... and 0.0111.... And those lead to f(1/2) = f(0.1000.. (base 2) ) = 1, and f(1/2) = f(0.0111.. (base 2) ) = π 2 /6 - 1. While these are...

- Fri Jun 28, 2019 8:39 am
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Errors/Warnings/Bugs
- Replies:
**598** - Views:
**198458**

### Re: Errors/Warnings/Bugs

We cannot make two consecutive posts in the same solution forum. I think you should be able to edit your post and add the content in the same post. I think you misunderstood the problem. The post is not shown in the problem thread so it cannot be edited. Hopefully it is just a caching problem that ...

- Thu Jun 27, 2019 10:03 am
- Forum: Discrete Mathematics
- Topic: The Satisfiability Problem... NP or P?!
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**9575**

### Re: The Satisfiability Problem... NP or P?!

https://medium.com/swlh/the-boolean-satisfiability-problem-solved-48ceb5550115 It is badly explained, and is certainly not a proof. It ends with: Considering that it is able to find a solution in most indices, as it usually works with a high probability (80%) then you can always try another index t...

- Tue May 28, 2019 1:44 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 672
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**5826**

### Re: Problem 672

Thanks for fixing that hk. Shouldn't there be a floor function around the $\frac{7^K-1}{11}$ term? I don't think there is a universally accepted meaning for a sum where the upper limit for the index variable is not an integer. Please investigate if $\frac{7^K-1}{11}$ isn't an integer for the values ...

- Tue May 28, 2019 12:35 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 672
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**5826**

### Problem 672

Is "no nothing" a typo for "do nothing"?

Shouldn't there be a floor function around the $\frac{7^K-1}{11}$ term? I don't think there is a universally accepted meaning for a sum where the upper limit for the index variable is not an integer.

Shouldn't there be a floor function around the $\frac{7^K-1}{11}$ term? I don't think there is a universally accepted meaning for a sum where the upper limit for the index variable is not an integer.

- Mon May 27, 2019 1:40 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 671
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**4676**

### Re: Problem 671

I have not solved this question yet, but have worked out F_4(3) on paper. @amagri: I believe those are indeed forbidden, so for both those reasons you cannot use a 1x3 tile when n=3. @MuthuVeerappanR: I think rotations around the axis of the loop are not considered different. I get 24+24+24+24+8 = 1...