Thank you for letting us know. The broken image has now been fixed.

## Search found 49 matches

- Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:25 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 570
- Replies:
**1** - Views:
**110**

- Mon Sep 23, 2019 5:31 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 669
- Replies:
**5** - Views:
**3218**

### Re: Problem 669

At this point, I'm about 1 step away from challenging the answer to this problem. I know a fair number of people have already solved this problem. I know I have everything in correctly, the program appears to operate just fine. I've done just about everything I can. Next step is to verify each step...

- Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:02 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Bookmark / Pinning a problem?
- Replies:
**25** - Views:
**1238**

### Re: Bookmark / Pinning a problem?

To answer your original question, the Project Euler site does not currently have any specific functionality for bookmarking problems (except for "filter by solved/unsolved"). The work-around I suggested earlier of using browser bookmarks may still be viable for the cross-device use case that you des...

- Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:49 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Bookmark / Pinning a problem?
- Replies:
**25** - Views:
**1238**

### Re: Bookmark / Pinning a problem?

Your web browser's bookmarking facility should be adequate for this job.

- Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:54 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 122
- Replies:
**14** - Views:
**5414**

### Re: Problem 122

Yes, your reasoning is correct.RishadanPort wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:31 pmIs m(1) considered 0 or 1?

I'm assuming 0 becomes you don't need any multiplication

- Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:43 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 351
- Replies:
**17** - Views:
**8280**

### Re: Problem 351

This question would be better asked in the solutions thread for this problem on the main site.RishadanPort wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:34 amok I solved this problem...

I am really wondering tho, why H(1000), H(1 000 000), and H(100 000 000) all look so similar... Can anyone explain? feel free to send me private message.

- Tue Jul 16, 2019 6:30 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 351
- Replies:
**17** - Views:
**8280**

### Re: Problem 351 Visibility of extremely far away orchard

Let the middle orchard represent (0, 0). if I have say an orchard that is on the X-Axis shifted (100 000 000 - 1) away but shifted up or below by 1, -- do I assume I can see this orchard even tho the line is extremely close to just horizontal line? I am guessing all orchards are points with no widt...

- Thu May 09, 2019 9:06 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 653
- Replies:
**2** - Views:
**2737**

### Re: Problem 653

My problem that I've realised that if two particles were to move toward each other while they are an odd number of millimetres away, they would meet at a point with half-integer position ( with a .5); which seemingly goes against what the rest of the problem is implying i.e that all values are inte...

- Mon Apr 22, 2019 7:09 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 013
- Replies:
**76** - Views:
**22216**

- Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:48 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 656
- Replies:
**9** - Views:
**1315**

### Re: Problem 656

No, that is still not the purpose of this forum.

As Animus said, "it is not appropiate to ask for help for recent problems that have not even reached 100 solvers".

- Fri Feb 01, 2019 6:27 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 090
- Replies:
**46** - Views:
**13233**

### Re: Problem 090

For the purposes of this problem, an "arrangement of two cubes" means a set of two cubes, where each cube is a set of six digits. Thus your "set of sets" interpretation is correct. If two "arrangements of two cubes" are found to differ from one another only be reordering the cubes, or by reordering ...

- Sun Nov 18, 2018 11:46 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 643
- Replies:
**8** - Views:
**3068**

- Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:02 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 420
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**4909**

### Re: Problem 420

To be clear: 'squaring' a matrix refers specifically to matrix multiplication of a matrix with itself.

- Sat Oct 06, 2018 11:48 am
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Errors/Warnings/Bugs
- Replies:
**517** - Views:
**100756**

### Re: Problems with [code] statement

I think the closing tag needs to contain '/code' rather than '\code'. In the thread for problem 633 in the forum, I posted my solution: https://projecteuler.net/thread=633;page=2#316037 The problem is that the "code" token or "code=Matlab" doesn't work: the token is printed out, and the code followi...

- Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:37 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Project Euler problem proposal rejects.
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**2266**

### Re: Project Euler problem proposal rejects.

I have already sent vamsikal3 a PM. The Admins are looking into this.

kenbrooker wrote: ↑Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:31 pmvamsikal3,

I hope my PM didn't thwart an

Administrator's reply to

your question?

- Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:56 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 353
- Replies:
**10** - Views:
**4472**

### Re: Problem 353

Are we supposed to calculate every single integer set of coordinates or are the only coordinates going to be (0,r,r) and stuff like that The admissible paths (from which you are asked to find the one with the lowest risk) are permitted to use any of the integer-coordinate points on the surface of $...

- Wed Aug 01, 2018 7:12 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 381
- Replies:
**9** - Views:
**4294**

### Re: Problem 381

I've removed your values from public view, but I can confirm that they were all correct.enigmaticcam wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 11:44 pmI'm getting an answer, but it's not correct. However I'm able to produce the correct number when p < 10^2. Can someone confirm if the next few powers of 10 are correct?

- Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:36 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 301
- Replies:
**9** - Views:
**2175**

### Re: Problem 301

Ah, I see. Nevertheless, the question is correct as stated.

{0, 0, 0} is a losing triple, but it does

If people need to count it to get the correct answer, it is likely they have an off-by-one error elsewhere.

{0, 0, 0} is a losing triple, but it does

*not*count towards the answer.If people need to count it to get the correct answer, it is likely they have an off-by-one error elsewhere.

- Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:29 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 301
- Replies:
**9** - Views:
**2175**

### Re: Problem 301

I'm happy to clarify that {0,0,0} is indeed a losing triplet. The player is "unable to move (because no stones remain)".

- Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:46 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 062
- Replies:
**15** - Views:
**4359**

### Re: Problem 062

@Winthermute - I have merged your post with the existing clarification topic for this problem.