## Search found 144 matches

- Thu Oct 04, 2018 1:46 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 444
- Replies:
**6** - Views:
**3026**

### Re: Problem 444

The former, yes -- any previous player's ticket, not just the one before them.

- Thu Jul 13, 2017 8:09 am
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Difficulty Ratings
- Replies:
**28** - Views:
**10086**

### Re: Difficulty Ratings

On the other hand: "If smart people solve it quickly, then *are you sure it is easy* ?", it could be easy for the smart people, but the average PE user might find it not so easy. This is just something to think about. Yes, it's entirely possible that something like this happens: -Problem A is relea...

- Thu Mar 09, 2017 8:30 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 262
- Replies:
**27** - Views:
**8248**

### Re: Question About Pb 262

$0 \leq x, y \leq 1600$ means $0 \leq x \leq 1600$ and $0 \leq y \leq 1600$

- Fri Mar 25, 2016 6:29 am
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Errors/Warnings/Bugs
- Replies:
**529** - Views:
**114559**

### Re: Errors/Warnings/Bugs

Thanks, fixed.

- Thu Sep 17, 2015 6:56 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 514
- Replies:
**1** - Views:
**854**

### Re: Problem 514

Updated.

- Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:17 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 521
- Replies:
**9** - Views:
**4401**

### Re: Problem 521

Hi all, Can problem 521 be solved by the "one minute rule"? Just *counting* to 10 12 took me on a fast computer more then 15 minutes (not finding primes, just counting). So will I need to expect a slow solution, or am I missing something that will enable me to solve it fastly? We don't release prob...

- Tue Apr 28, 2015 10:44 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Errors/Warnings/Bugs
- Replies:
**529** - Views:
**114559**

### Re: Errors/Warnings/Bugs

459 was one of the few problems that had < 100 solvers when the site had to be taken offline for a while (mid June - mid August 2014). As a result, the Fastest Solvers lists for those problems were locked when site access was restored.

- Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:25 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Dependency charts
- Replies:
**1** - Views:
**714**

### Re: Dependency charts

With respect to why they are not published, dependency charts would fall into the same general scope as category tags/awards. See here.

- Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:43 am
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: In case of rejecting a new problem proposal...
- Replies:
**1** - Views:
**1054**

### Re: In case of rejecting a new problem proposal...

Typically yes, the user is notified.

- Sat Mar 21, 2015 5:45 am
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Search button?
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**1479**

### Re: Search button?

@solarmew: The lack of category tags has been intentional. If a category is too vague, it won't be helpful. If a category is too detailed, it might give away a solution. For example, what looks like a trig or combinatorics problem on the surface might actually be something else in disguise (e.g. a d...

- Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:41 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 497
- Replies:
**5** - Views:
**1840**

### Re: Problem 497

No, he won't pass up the chance.

- Wed Feb 25, 2015 7:29 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 504
- Replies:
**12** - Views:
**4234**

### Re: Problem 504

Strict containment = lattice points on the lines of the quadrilateral are not counted.

- Sun Feb 08, 2015 1:28 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 502
- Replies:
**17** - Views:
**7081**

### Re: Problem 502

1. Blocks can be placed on top of other blocks as long as nothing sticks out past the edgesor hangs out over open space.

- Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:18 am
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 495
- Replies:
**2** - Views:
**1799**

### Re: Problem 495

The integers must be distinct (i.e. different from each other).

- Sat Jan 03, 2015 8:30 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: problem 206
- Replies:
**33** - Views:
**11093**

### Re: problem 206

Right -- they do not have to be distinct.

- Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:14 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 059
- Replies:
**95** - Views:
**24806**

### Re: Problem 059

The sentence "This is a percent sign: %" makes perfect sense. So does "The letters sdgvsgsc are gibberish." The two sentences meet the criteria of *necessarily* containing English words, i.e. they must contain English words and they do. Yes, those sentences make sense in English -- and even if the ...

- Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:00 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 494
- Replies:
**10** - Views:
**2716**

### Re: Problem 494

For each problem released, all numbers / figures / answers are independently confirmed by three or more development team members.

Also, as of this post, this problem has two public solvers so far.

Also, as of this post, this problem has two public solvers so far.

- Sun Dec 14, 2014 6:07 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 481
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**3480**

### Re: Problem 481

W

_{3}(1) = 0.29375 is the correct result.- Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:47 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 481
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**3480**

### Re: Problem 481

Yes, it'd be chef #1's turn again (assuming he/she is not eliminated by chef #3).

- Sat Dec 13, 2014 5:25 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 481
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**3480**

### Re: Problem 481

As per the big red box near the top of this page, please do not discuss partial results/spoilers or ask for hints. http://projecteuler.chat/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1356#p12839 http://projecteuler.chat/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1989#p21039 That being said: In general, if you can't get the math to work out fo...