## Search found 5 matches

- Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:35 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 317
- Replies:
**39** - Views:
**19076**

### Re: Problem 317

I'm sure I've done this correctly, especially after reading old comments on here. I think I have a precision problem, could someone help me troubleshoot by checking that the 6 decimals after the 4 decimals asked for in the problem statement are 170668 ? In other words, the solution looks something l...

- Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:51 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Number of solvers for the latest 160 problems
- Replies:
**16** - Views:
**1143**

### Re: Number of solvers for the latest 160 problems

The number of unique solvers with a public account for these problems is 708. That's more than I thought. All unique solvers for those problems are 809. That's interesting. Based on the fact that the most recent problems have a range of [63,390] I assumed the elite veterans who were solving these m...

- Tue Feb 16, 2021 5:37 pm
- Forum: News, Suggestions, and FAQ
- Topic: Number of solvers for the latest 160 problems
- Replies:
**16** - Views:
**1143**

### Re: Number of solvers for the latest 160 problems

A lot of people do peter out. At this link https://projecteuler.net/problem_analysis you can see the % of people who have solved x problems or more, when considering registered users who have solved at least 1. So the amount of people who have solved at least 1 problem is 100%, whereas the number of...

- Thu Jan 14, 2021 9:03 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 710
- Replies:
**15** - Views:
**4584**

### Re: Problem 710

About 10 minutes ago I was sure I had found the key to this problem but it seems there is probably another key I'm missing. Could someone verify for me that t(100) ends in 6767 and t(1000) ends in 0496?

- Thu Dec 31, 2020 8:11 pm
- Forum: Clarifications on Project Euler Problems
- Topic: Problem 684
- Replies:
**16** - Views:
**6824**

### Re: Problem 684

I'd be willing to do some cross verification with you. I haven't solved it yet either but I believe I have it running correctly so far up to the mid-30 of fibonacci numbers. Feel free to pm me on here.PurpleBlu3s wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 6:15 pm Is anyone willing to verify a couple of intermediate results?